Britain faces calls for unity govt amid Brexit impasse

The U.K. may be forced to make a national unity government to end the impasse over Britain leaving the European Union, as Prime Minister Theresa May clings into the Brexit divorce agreement that Parliament has rejected three times, a senior Conservative suggested Saturday.

Former Education Secretary Nicky Morgan’s remarks came a day after the House of Commons rebuffed the prime minister’s call for lawmakers to”set aside self and party,” sending her Brexit deal to its most recent defeat. The rejection leaves the U.K. facing the stark possibility of a chaotic departure from the EU in two weeks — unless squabbling politicians could put aside their differences and engineer a very long delay in the practice of departing the bloc.

Even the British Parliament will vote in an endeavor to get an idea that may command a majority on a variety of Brexit alternatives. However, May’s government is considering a fourth vote her agreement, bolstered by their success in narrowing her allowance of defeat out of 230 votes at January Friday on 58 votes.

“When the authorities denied and Theresa May believed she couldn’t apply what Parliament had recognized as a method of leaving the EU, I believe we would need to think very hard about whether a cross-party coalition… would do that in order to be certain that the U.K. does render the EU in a orderly manner,” Morgan told the BBC.

Britain has in times of crisis, including World War II had national unity authorities previously. But critics point out that these coalitions were forged when there was a single goal — for example beating Nazi Germany. It’s unclear now Britain’s political parties could agree to collaborate on a problem like Brexit, that has split its two leading political parties and the country, the ruling Conservatives of May and the opposition Labour Party.

As a result of Friday’s vote, the U.K. is now scheduled to leave the EU on April 12, whether or not both sides have reached a deal to cushion the effect. This has caused concerns about shortages of foods and drugs, border gridlock and crippling tariffs.

EU officials have suggested, however, they might agree to a lengthy delay to Britain’s passing from the bloc if U.K. politicians agree to a strategy.

The House of Commons on Wednesday began the practice of debating alternatives to the minister’s deal but rejected. Significant support was, attained by two thoughts, another referendum on some arrangement and a customs union with the EU. Lawmakers are expected to hold another round of votes Monday.

Hilary Benn, a Labour Party lawmaker who chairs the Brexit committee of Parliament, dismissed criticism that the parliamentary procedure proved to be a failure because it did not deliver a majority. Benn said he expects the most recent defeat for May’s deal will”concentrate minds” and help construct a clear majority for a number of the Brexit choices.

“As it took 2 3/4 years to the government to get exactly that which it had negotiated defeated three occasions, it is a tiny bit harsh on Parliament, as it began the process last Wednesday, without having instantly solved the problem in 24 hours,” Benn said. “So I feel just a bit longer is a totally reasonable issue to supply as we try and find a way forward.”

While Benn and Morgan are pushing for compromise, others are demanding that the Conservative-led authorities not cave in.

The letter, signed by 170 members of the prime minister’s party, predicted on May to deliver back her deal to Parliament to get a vote that was fourth , with the danger of a general election if it’s rejected , ” the newspaper said.

Brandon Lewis, a Cabinet member and chairman of the Conservative Party, said he was aware of the letter, even though he hadn’t seen the signatures or the text.

“We must do what we can to leave the European Union in good order as fast as we can, as we stated in our manifesto and as we’ve mentioned to Parliament,” Lewis stated. “I feel the deal is the ideal way to do this”


Follow AP’s complete coverage of Brexit in: