<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Aboard the Raul Ibanez Bandwagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/</link>
	<description>Covering America&#039;s Favorite Pastime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/blogs/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>ksw... what evidence do you have of Ibanez being streaky. In his splits, he typically has a down May but the rest are pretty consistent. Earlier in his career he went hitless for 8 games in &#039;01, 7 games in &#039;00 and 5 games in &#039;95, &#039;98 and &#039;02.

Pat the Bat was VERY streaky and typically took June off. He also posted hitless streaks of 5 or more in &#039;07 with 6, in &#039;08 with 5, in &#039;07 with 5 twice, in &#039;00, &#039;03 and &#039;06 with 5 also. 

I always like Pat Burrell... I thought they should resign him. I don&#039;t know if I&#039;m as critical of the Ibanez move especially with what Burrell initially wanted. The economic bottoming out makes this deal look a lot more lopsided than it is but so far, Raul looks like an upgrade.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3629&#039;,&#039;Brian Joseph&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3629&#039;,&#039;Brian Joseph&#039;,&#039;ksw... what evidence do you have of Ibanez being streaky. In his splits, he typically has a down May but the rest are pretty consistent. Earlier in his career he went hitless for 8 games in \&#039;01, 7 games in \&#039;00 and 5 games in \&#039;95, \&#039;98 and \&#039;02.\r\n\r\nPat the Bat was VERY streaky and typically took June off. He also posted hitless streaks of 5 or more in \&#039;07 with 6, in \&#039;08 with 5, in \&#039;07 with 5 twice, in \&#039;00, \&#039;03 and \&#039;06 with 5 also. \r\n\r\nI always like Pat Burrell... I thought they should resign him. I don\&#039;t know if I\&#039;m as critical of the Ibanez move especially with what Burrell initially wanted. The economic bottoming out makes this deal look a lot more lopsided than it is but so far, Raul looks like an upgrade.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ksw&#8230; what evidence do you have of Ibanez being streaky. In his splits, he typically has a down May but the rest are pretty consistent. Earlier in his career he went hitless for 8 games in &#8216;01, 7 games in &#8216;00 and 5 games in &#8216;95, &#8216;98 and &#8216;02.</p>
<p>Pat the Bat was VERY streaky and typically took June off. He also posted hitless streaks of 5 or more in &#8216;07 with 6, in &#8216;08 with 5, in &#8216;07 with 5 twice, in &#8216;00, &#8216;03 and &#8216;06 with 5 also. </p>
<p>I always like Pat Burrell&#8230; I thought they should resign him. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m as critical of the Ibanez move especially with what Burrell initially wanted. The economic bottoming out makes this deal look a lot more lopsided than it is but so far, Raul looks like an upgrade.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3629','Brian Joseph'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3629','Brian Joseph','ksw... what evidence do you have of Ibanez being streaky. In his splits, he typically has a down May but the rest are pretty consistent. Earlier in his career he went hitless for 8 games in \'01, 7 games in \'00 and 5 games in \'95, \'98 and \'02.\r\n\r\nPat the Bat was VERY streaky and typically took June off. He also posted hitless streaks of 5 or more in \'07 with 6, in \'08 with 5, in \'07 with 5 twice, in \'00, \'03 and \'06 with 5 also. \r\n\r\nI always like Pat Burrell... I thought they should resign him. I don\'t know if I\'m as critical of the Ibanez move especially with what Burrell initially wanted. The economic bottoming out makes this deal look a lot more lopsided than it is but so far, Raul looks like an upgrade.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Baer</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-3626</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Baer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/blogs/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/#comment-3626</guid>
		<description>bsball, thanks for correcting me with the standard deviations. I probably should have pulled my stats notes out when I was writing that.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3626&#039;,&#039;Bill Baer&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3626&#039;,&#039;Bill Baer&#039;,&#039;bsball, thanks for correcting me with the standard deviations. I probably should have pulled my stats notes out when I was writing that.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bsball, thanks for correcting me with the standard deviations. I probably should have pulled my stats notes out when I was writing that.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3626','Bill Baer'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3626','Bill Baer','bsball, thanks for correcting me with the standard deviations. I probably should have pulled my stats notes out when I was writing that.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsball</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-3625</link>
		<dc:creator>bsball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/blogs/2009/05/07/all-aboard-the-raul-ibanez-bandwagon/#comment-3625</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thought on statistics.</p>
<p>My read of your interpretation is that Ibanezâ€™s defensive performance is so far above what you would expect from him that he canâ€™t possibly continue to play this well.  The sample is an extreme outlier and that indicates that itâ€™s bad.  </p>
<p>I think thatâ€™s not quite right.  I would say that his performance this year is well within the range that you could expect for 1 month of games given that heâ€™s a -4.45 talent fielder. If you looked at all of his UZRs by month you would expect about 20% of those to be at or above his April 2009 performance.  Because there is so much variation when looking at results from short time periods you should put more faith in his 6 years of UZR data than you do in his last monthâ€™s performance.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3625','bsball'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3625','bsball','One more thought on statistics.\r\n\r\nMy read of your interpretation is that Ibanez&acirc;€™s defensive performance is so far above what you would expect from him that he can&acirc;€™t possibly continue to play this well.  The sample is an extreme outlier and that indicates that it&acirc;€™s bad.  \r\n\r\nI think that&acirc;€™s not quite right.  I would say that his performance this year is well within the range that you could expect for 1 month of games given that he&acirc;€™s a -4.45 talent fielder. If you looked at all of his UZRs by month you would expect about 20% of those to be at or above his April 2009 performance.  Because there is so much variation when looking at results from short time periods you should put more faith in his 6 years of UZR data than you do in his last month&acirc;€™s performance.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

